Risk
Jan 18, 2021
Credit risk management is best described as the practice of mitigating financial loss by understanding and eliminating various risk factors in the credit risk process. Thus, a proper credit risk management strategy is crucial for lenders for several reasons. It is not only necessary for the increasingly regulated finance environment, but it can also become a marked business advantage.
Despite its importance, however, there is still some confusion over the best practices for lenders. In the article below, we will dive into the best practices banks use to mitigate risks and ensure all their loans are sustainable.
What is credit risk management in banks? Credit risk management in banks refers to the structured practices and systems used to identify, assess, and mitigate the risk of borrower default. It ensures that banks maintain a balanced portfolio, comply with regulatory standards, and reduce exposure to financial loss.
The overarching goal is to protect profitability and support responsible lending practices. By deploying effective measures, banks strengthen portfolio resilience and safeguard their long-term sustainability.
The importance of credit risk management in banking lies in its ability to protect institutions and economies from instability. Within the credit risk management in banking sector, strong practices help banks meet regulatory obligations, avoid capital erosion, and maintain customer trust.
For fintech companies like Credolab, compliance with strict regulatory frameworks remains essential, particularly when leveraging machine learning (ML) to analyse consent-based data. By minimising default risks, banks also preserve profit margins, ensuring both resilience and long-term growth.
How do banks manage credit risk? Traditionally, the process has hinged on the lender’s understanding of the borrower. Banks would review factors such as the borrower’s current financial situation, their previous loans, and repayment history to determine lending decisions.
The information that a bank has on a potential borrower forms the basis of their lending decision, and also the terms and conditions of the loan. Here is where risk-based pricing comes in, where borrowers deemed to have a higher risk of default are subjected to a higher rate of interest.
Another typical credit risk management practice is to require periodic management information system (MIS) reports. With MIS reports, borrowers will have to submit pre-determined financial statements to their lender every now and then. This makes it easier to monitor one’s financial status and assess whether they will be capable of paying back their loan.
A well-defined lending criterion for banks gives a clear idea of what loans can or cannot be made. These criteria should consider a bank’s target market, the terms and conditions of repayment, the purpose of a loan, and the source of repayment.
For many banks, there is also a strict cap on the amount that can be lent out, no matter who the borrower is. The purpose of this is to emphasise exactly which risks a bank is willing or not willing to take, and to remind employees to always practice caution when dealing with clients.
Retail banking, also known as consumer or personal banking, provides financial services such as deposits, loans, and payments directly to individual customers rather than to corporations or institutions. The credit risk management process in retail banks includes:
Traditional ways of credit risk management include assessing borrowers' credit histories, income verification, and repayment behaviour. To enhance stability, banks often set up a strict credit-granting process, ensuring that loan approvals meet both internal and external guidelines.
How do banks evaluate credit risk without traditional scores? Increasingly, they turn to alternative data sources. Instead of relying solely on bureau histories, banks consider telco data, payment behaviour, and smartphone metadata. This shift reflects the growing digital footprint of consumers, particularly those with thin or no formal credit files.
ML models then analyse these patterns to generate more inclusive, predictive scores. In doing so, banks can extend services to broader populations while maintaining regulatory compliance and profitability.
The use of credit risk management in banking has evolved with ML. ML models detect hidden trends, predict defaults, and enhance underwriting accuracy. Unlike manual processes, these tools can reduce human bias while adapting to real-time borrower behaviour.
Retail banks benefit from faster decision-making, better compliance readiness, and scalable portfolio management. Furthermore, ML-driven scoring supports both inclusivity and regulatory scrutiny, reinforcing the effectiveness of credit risk assessment in banks.
A strong credit risk management framework for banks integrates governance, risk appetite, policies, scoring models, and monitoring practices. Core components include:
By combining policy discipline with technology, banks reduce exposure while enhancing trust and operational resilience.
Modern credit risk in banks presents challenges such as incomplete data, rapidly changing regulations, and customer segmentation. Thin-file borrowers, in particular, lack conventional histories, while cybersecurity risks demand advanced defences. Yet, modern digital tools and ML-powered models can mitigate these challenges, enhancing resilience and efficiency.
Banks today rely on automated platforms, predictive analytics, and secure consent-driven data sources. These innovations streamline lending, protect sensitive information, and improve portfolio performance.
Though traditional credit scoring has been practised for numerous decades already, it is not without its downsides. For one, traditional credit scoring has usually relied on past bank statements, loans and credit history as grounds for deciding whether a loan should be approved.
This causes it to favour those with longer credit histories, thus rendering it unable to reach the unbanked and underbanked market. The bias towards customers with longer credit history (and therefore more personal data to go off) then dismisses those new to the financial system, simply as “risks”.
While the traditional data sources look at the past behaviour of the applicant to assess their creditworthiness, more and more banks have realised that alternative data sources should be looked at.
For example, smartphone metadata can look at thousands of behavioural data points (after all, our smartphones leave enormous digital footprints) to predict the likelihood of an applicant defaulting. The abundance of data makes it easier for loan checks to be cleared, a process that would traditionally take weeks, if not months.
Furthermore, using alternative data makes it easier for banks to reach out to the likes of the unbanked, the fresh graduates and the gig-workers as it solves the problem of them being unable to present proof of their creditworthiness in the traditional sense. Not only does this let lenders widen their pool of potential clients, but it also promotes financial inclusivity.
Lenders should also consider the fact that, as of 2018, the World Bank has found that as many as 1.7 billion adults remain unbanked—yet two-thirds of these people also own a mobile phone, representing a vastly untapped market. Recent studies by the Global Findex Database suggest that extending financial services to the world’s unbanked and underbanked population could unlock over US $300 billion in annual global GDP, underscoring how greater inclusion, enabled by alternative data and machine learning (ML)-driven credit models, can drive sustainable economic growth.
In a field where competition is becoming increasingly fierce and technology is driving new customer behaviour, it is a no-brainer to invest in proper and up-to-date credit risk management solutions to tap into new and existing customer segments with greater accuracy and profitability.
The digital age, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, will weed out those businesses that lack the vigour to update their legacy practices and offer customers a smooth, frictionless banking experience that they demand today.
To strengthen resilience, banks should:
Together, these five best practices enable banks to operate sustainably while protecting their customers and portfolios.
It is the structured approach banks use to reduce losses from defaults and maintain financial stability.
Default risk, concentration risk, and country risk are the most common.
They use borrower data, alternative sources, and ML-driven models to assess repayment likelihood.
It involves identification, assessment, control, and monitoring using credit history and strict lending criteria.
It protects profit margins, ensures compliance, builds customer trust, and prevents systemic instability.